Personally: I think both are improvements, overall I prefer the simpler approach to 2.5-8 (i.e. just having 2.5). There’s a lot of conceptual overlap between speech input, input methods, and device settings. For me the simpler grouping matters more than where (new) individual SCs go. Cheers, -Alastair From: Michael Gower Changes from existing editor's draft: * rename the existing Pointer Accessible guideline to Input Methods * remove the word "pointer" from the existing short description of the guideline to now read: "Make it easier for users to operate functionality." * remove Additional Sensor Inputs (put Motion Actuation under Input Methods) * move Orientation to Adaptable -- where it fits well: "Create content that can be presented in different ways (for example simpler layout) without losing information or structure." * move Character Key Shortcuts to Keyboard Accessible. It is where it fits practically and linguistically; speech operability rides on top of the keyboard API. * move Label in Name to Compatible, where it fits well with the second Intention ("exposing information in the content in standard ways that assistive technologies can recognize and interact with.") *Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2018 23:59:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:25 UTC