What I mean is that authors should be add their own slow scroll, because it
shows users they moving on the same page, not going to another page.
Cheers,
David MacDonald
*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
Tel: 613.235.4902
LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
twitter.com/davidmacd
GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
* Adapting the web to all users*
* Including those with disabilities*
If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
>
>
> > If we want slow scroll to be in scope, then I would suggest
> reintroducing our time exemption, scoping out animations less than 3
> seconds, or 1 second at least.
>
>
>
> I don’t think that is necessary.
>
>
>
> From the proposed SC text:
>
> “Motion or size animations triggered by a user action can be disabled
> without preventing the action, unless the animation is essential to the
> functionality or the information being conveyed.”
>
>
>
> Slow-scroll is an animation the author has added to the native
> functionality, and not required for performing the action, so is not
> “essential”.
>
>
>
> It would make a good example in the understanding though.
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>