W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2017

Re: motion or scaling animations

From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 09:51:54 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAdDpDbfKVXg+1MO+6YFJA+reNxm40djB1ytWcTXAyghNS1DxQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Cc: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>, Michael Gower <michael.gower@ca.ibm.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
What I mean is that authors should be add their own slow scroll, because it
shows users they moving on the same page, not going to another page.

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
wrote:

> Hi David,
>
>
>
> > If we want slow scroll to be in scope, then I would suggest
> reintroducing our time exemption, scoping out animations less than 3
> seconds, or 1 second at least.
>
>
>
> I don’t think that is necessary.
>
>
>
> From the proposed SC text:
>
> “Motion or size animations triggered by a user action can be disabled
> without preventing the action, unless the animation is essential to the
> functionality or the information being conveyed.”
>
>
>
> Slow-scroll is an animation the author has added to the native
> functionality, and not required for performing the action, so is not
> “essential”.
>
>
>
> It would make a good example in the understanding though.
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
Received on Friday, 15 December 2017 14:52:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:18 UTC