What I mean is that authors should be add their own slow scroll, because it shows users they moving on the same page, not going to another page. Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > Hi David, > > > > > If we want slow scroll to be in scope, then I would suggest > reintroducing our time exemption, scoping out animations less than 3 > seconds, or 1 second at least. > > > > I don’t think that is necessary. > > > > From the proposed SC text: > > “Motion or size animations triggered by a user action can be disabled > without preventing the action, unless the animation is essential to the > functionality or the information being conveyed.” > > > > Slow-scroll is an animation the author has added to the native > functionality, and not required for performing the action, so is not > “essential”. > > > > It would make a good example in the understanding though. > > > > -Alastair >Received on Friday, 15 December 2017 14:52:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:18 UTC