Yep, agreed. once we get some better research, we can think about timing, but we pulled it out because we just don't have the data on thresholds. That resulted in taking the timing out and moving to AAA. Michael Gower IBM Accessibility Research 1803 Douglas Street, Victoria, BC V8T 5C3 gowerm@ca.ibm.com voice: (250) 220-1146 * cel: (250) 661-0098 * fax: (250) 220-8034 From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> To: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> Cc: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>, Michael Gower <michael.gower@ca.ibm.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Date: 2017-12-15 06:15 AM Subject: Re: motion or scaling animations Hi David, > If we want slow scroll to be in scope, then I would suggest reintroducing our time exemption, scoping out animations less than 3 seconds, or 1 second at least. I don’t think that is necessary. From the proposed SC text: “Motion or size animations triggered by a user action can be disabled without preventing the action, unless the animation is essential to the functionality or the information being conveyed.” Slow-scroll is an animation the author has added to the native functionality, and not required for performing the action, so is not “essential”. It would make a good example in the understanding though. -AlastairReceived on Friday, 15 December 2017 14:49:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:18 UTC