- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 12:49:16 -0500
- To: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com>
- Cc: "W3c-Wai-Gl-Request@W3. Org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAdDpDayD1eFdGZy_0jmHYxpaTg8MEhst2NCpcqY4WJW5jYEPg@mail.gmail.com>
Can we just go back to the TPAC version? ... it was almost there... I don't see any movement forward with this new language. Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com> wrote: > > - As I understand it, the problem is that multiple notifications > creates problems. Another interpretation of this is that there can only be > one warning in a process covering a series of pages, but that runs into > problems with the conformance model. > > > > It also seems to indicate that a countdown timer would fail. While I > understand this could cause stress timers are needed on some sites. > > > > In other places the timer is reset each time you type something. So > perhaps we could differentiate or allow the user to hide the countdown > timer. > > > > Jonathan > > > > *From:* Andrew Kirkpatrick [mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com] > *Sent:* Friday, December 1, 2017 12:24 PM > *To:* Michael Gower <michael.gower@ca.ibm.com> > *Cc:* W3c-Wai-Gl-Request@W3. Org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > *Subject:* Re: timeouts > > > > As I understand it, the problem is that multiple notifications creates > problems. Another interpretation of this is that there can only be one > warning in a process covering a series of pages, but that runs into > problems with the conformance model. > > > > Thanks, > > AWK > > > > Andrew Kirkpatrick > > Group Product Manager, Accessibility > > Adobe > > > > akirkpat@adobe.com > > http://twitter.com/awkawk > > > > *From: *Michael Gower <michael.gower@ca.ibm.com> > *Date: *Friday, December 1, 2017 at 12:20 > *To: *Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> > *Cc: *WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > *Subject: *Re: timeouts > > > > I read this that if an author notifies a user more than once, the page > fails. What is the rationale? > > Michael Gower > IBM Accessibility > Research > > 1803 Douglas Street, Victoria, BC > <https://maps.google.com/?q=1803+Douglas+Street,+Victoria,+BC+%C2%A0V8T+5C3&entry=gmail&source=g> > V8T 5C3 > <https://maps.google.com/?q=1803+Douglas+Street,+Victoria,+BC+%C2%A0V8T+5C3&entry=gmail&source=g> > gowerm@ca.ibm.com > voice: (250) 220-1146 * cel: (250) 661-0098 * fax: (250) 220-8034 > > > > From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> > To: "W3c-Wai-Gl-Request@W3. Org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > Date: 2017-12-01 07:36 AM > Subject: Re: timeouts > ------------------------------ > > > > For context, at TPAC the language that was nearly agreed to was: > > Where data can be lost due to user inactivity, users are warned about the > estimated length of inactivity that generates the data loss unless the data > is preserved for a minimum of 20 hours of user inactivity. > > > > Lisa is proposing: > > Where data can be lost due to user inactivity, users are warned @@once, > before an activity timer is set,@@ about the estimated length of inactivity > that generates the data loss, unless the data is preserved for a minimum > of 20 hours of user inactivity. > > > > So, the main change is the addition of “once, before an activity timer is > set”. I think that we need to acknowledge that the amount of time before > the timer is set may be measured in milliseconds, but it is at least ahead > of time. I’m less sure about the “once” part but can live with it. > > > > Thanks, > > AWK > > > > Andrew Kirkpatrick > > Group Product Manager, Accessibility > > Adobe > > > > akirkpat@adobe.com > > http://twitter.com/awkawk > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7C378d77fc8a964101760508d538dfdb85%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636477456467953915&sdata=32KymBMMErT4tZ5R9gD9hixkX9mOIbBf3Ej%2Bwy%2B2%2BaQ%3D&reserved=0> > > > > *From: *Mike Elledge <melledge@yahoo.com> > * Reply-To: *Mike Elledge <melledge@yahoo.com> > * Date: *Friday, December 1, 2017 at 09:37 > * To: *WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > * Cc: *"lisa.seeman@zoho.com" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> > * Subject: *Re: timeouts > * Resent-From: *WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > * Resent-Date: *Friday, December 1, 2017 at 09:36 > > > > +1 > > > > On Friday, December 1, 2017 8:47 AM, John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com> > wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > JF > > > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:00 AM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> > wrote: > > The coga task force can live with the following wording for time outs > > > > > Where data can be lost due to user inactivity, users are warned once, > before an activity timer is set, about the estimated length of inactivity > that generates the data loss, unless the data is preserved for a minimum > of 20 hours of user inactivity. > > > > however we do object to the change the hours from 20 to 24 , but we would > rather it goes in with that change then be left out. > > All the best > > Lisa Seeman > > LinkedIn > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%3Dhttps-3A__na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com_-3Furl-3Dhttp-253A-252F-252Fil.linkedin.com-252Fin-252Flisaseeman-252F-26data-3D02-257C01-257Cakirkpat-2540adobe.com-257C4cc65966f9ce44ef1d6a08d538c907d1-257Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1-257C0-257C0-257C636477358425177460-26sdata-3Dh9TYyQc9NVdodbVxUmIAVuSviDwAI38HcflS91w98rI-253D-26reserved-3D0%26d%3DDwMGaQ%26c%3Djf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg%26r%3D_9rqR3xSCWQUlv9VpOcJwkP7H0XWQXmxeMmqQl6Fikc%26m%3DKDmkdqR6ul2gWtGasZHFT7Xr7NdL1o5ii4KK0QLchuM%26s%3DATUbvTH4TPf9xBV06j10vQ0FfX6OEA-rsENeAAnB_d0%26e%3D&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7C378d77fc8a964101760508d538dfdb85%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636477456467953915&sdata=%2B9YKqC2xmqiXjORS0YMrEHRiN3l5JuBDn%2FecQjz7618%3D&reserved=0>, > Twitter > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%3Dhttps-3A__na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com_-3Furl-3Dhttps-253A-252F-252Ftwitter.com-252FSeemanLisa-26data-3D02-257C01-257Cakirkpat-2540adobe.com-257C4cc65966f9ce44ef1d6a08d538c907d1-257Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1-257C0-257C0-257C636477358425177460-26sdata-3Da9VFXTMDhGY3i-252BdDpvY0Sw1jgmjYfCfGHp-252FT5pXsSsk-253D-26reserved-3D0%26d%3DDwMGaQ%26c%3Djf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg%26r%3D_9rqR3xSCWQUlv9VpOcJwkP7H0XWQXmxeMmqQl6Fikc%26m%3DKDmkdqR6ul2gWtGasZHFT7Xr7NdL1o5ii4KK0QLchuM%26s%3DQY7QMzaLfjW0kPr7i-w8lwBxd7sRYqU5wxR7iO_OcFg%26e%3D&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7C378d77fc8a964101760508d538dfdb85%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636477456467953915&sdata=RlQVqjcV7BfYs8IE%2FET%2FQqiIwJ6D4UQfHBURHQSx5ho%3D&reserved=0> > > > > > > -- > > John Foliot > > Principal Accessibility Strategist > > Deque Systems Inc. > > john.foliot@deque.com > > > > Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion > > > > >
Received on Friday, 1 December 2017 17:49:43 UTC