Re: can we live with the wording for Interruptions

LOL....I need to sleep

This (I think) Is the 2.1 AA text


A mechanism is easily available to postpone and suppress interruptions and changes in content, unless they are initiated by the user or involve an emergency.




All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn, Twitter





---- On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 22:48:21 +0200 Andrew Kirkpatrick<akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote ---- 

      Lisa,
 I can live with that, but that language is already in WCAG 2.0, as SC 2.2.4. Are you thinking about different language?
  
  
   Thanks,
 
  AWK
 
   
 
  Andrew Kirkpatrick
 
  Group Product Manager, Accessibility
 
  Adobe 
 
   
 
  akirkpat@adobe.com
 
 
 http://twitter.com/awkawk
  
  From: "lisa.seeman@zoho.com" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
 Date: Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 14:01
 To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
 Subject: can we live with the wording for Interruptions
 Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
 Resent-Date: Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 13:59
 
   
 
    Interruptions  is at 
 Level AAA
 
   
 
  Can we live with the current wording? 
 
 Interruptions can be postponed or suppressed by the user, except interruptions involving an emergency.
  
  All the best
 
 Lisa Seeman
 
 LinkedIn,  Twitter