Re: can we live with the wording for Interruptions

Lisa,
I can live with that, but that language is already in WCAG 2.0, as SC 2.2.4. Are you thinking about different language?


Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe

akirkpat@adobe.com
http://twitter.com/awkawk


From: "lisa.seeman@zoho.com" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
Date: Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 14:01
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: can we live with the wording for Interruptions
Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 13:59


Interruptions  is at
Level AAA

Can we live with the current wording?

Interruptions can be postponed or suppressed by the user, except interruptions involving an emergency<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Frawgit.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag21%2Fpurpose_of_controls_changes2%2Fguidelines%2Findex.html%23dfn-emergency&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7C9f4112cf8fb64f2ae06508d53824ba11%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636476652751455732&sdata=GzSDRGCSLJBgP5ID0uIiVPmRMb0WBGaoR9Ea%2B8aGYBM%3D&reserved=0>.

All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fil.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Flisaseeman%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7C9f4112cf8fb64f2ae06508d53824ba11%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636476652751455732&sdata=BuSBAUtB36LbggbBtZZE2CXsOGtWbAHXTcqiAKR33dY%3D&reserved=0>, Twitter<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2FSeemanLisa&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7C9f4112cf8fb64f2ae06508d53824ba11%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636476652751455732&sdata=afe73oPpK%2Fdqz4mYjBYtj1q9V2N7274ELPkOSgYoQL4%3D&reserved=0>