RE: Mikes request that we identify an upper limit on the number of digits



From: Alastair Campbell [mailto:acampbell@nomensa.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 7:52 AM
To: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
Cc: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>; W3c-Wai-Gl-Request@W3. Org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Mikes request that we identify an upper limit on the number of digits

The TL;DR is that there are solutions for 2FA, but in the way it applies to websites it is currently Chrome-only. I don’t think that would be acceptable?

[Jason] No, probably not. With apologies, I seem to have missed those details. Could you provide a link? Do you expect additional, interoperable implementations in other UAs to be forthcoming within a reasonable time?


________________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.


Thank you for your compliance.

________________________________

Received on Tuesday, 28 November 2017 14:44:15 UTC