- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 16:33:20 -0700
- To: Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com>
- Cc: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAdDpDbSu584=NHCwDXBDwK6pRytUqtUo2sFFfaYtcwHtdaCSQ@mail.gmail.com>
+1 Note: that this may be perceived to be a lower requirement than the previous wording, because there may be instances where content doesn't work in a particular orientation, not because it was *actively restricted* but rather *passively messed up*. I don't know for sure if that is true, but it seems less demanding than previous. Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Nov 20, 2017 5:17 PM, "Andrew Kirkpatrick" <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote: > >> Call For Consensus — ends November 22st at 5:00pm Boston time. >> >> >> >> The Working Group has discussed a change to the Orientation SC, as >> proposed in this survey (https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wb >> s/35422/resoling_orientation/results) >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2002%2F09%2Fwbs%2F35422%2Fresoling_orientation%2Fresults)&data=02%7C01%7C%7C9de0747ce34b4a52b97308d52de7eb57%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636465396470480819&sdata=QNU3oV%2F7CHphXPOJP1me5FAbLeAlj0F1taiBdQFDmO0%3D&reserved=0> >> and discussed on the November 20 call (https://www.w3.org/2017/11/20 >> -ag-minutes.html#item02). >> >> >> >> The new proposed SC test is: >> >> “Content does not restrict its view and operation to a single display >> orientation, such as portrait or landscape, unless a specific display >> orientation is essential.” >> >> >> >> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not >> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not >> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before >> the CfC deadline. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> AWK >> >> >> >> Andrew Kirkpatrick >> >> Group Product Manager, Accessibility >> >> Adobe >> >> >> >> akirkpat@adobe.com >> >> http://twitter.com/awkawk >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7C%7C54093524ef264326424008d51cd66c05%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636446629619786436&sdata=c5UP0xiniJIppvd6Esu1XA%2FbX1ykpABkhgCCmBp%2Fht8%3D&reserved=0> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> https://www.w3.org/2017/11/20-ag-minutes.html#item02 >> >
Received on Monday, 20 November 2017 23:33:45 UTC