Re: CfC - Orientation (2nd try)

+1

On Nov 20, 2017 5:17 PM, "Andrew Kirkpatrick" <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote:

> Call For Consensus — ends November 22st at 5:00pm Boston time.
>
>
>
> The Working Group has discussed a change to the Orientation SC, as
> proposed in this survey (https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/resoling_
> orientation/results)
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2002%2F09%2Fwbs%2F35422%2Fresoling_orientation%2Fresults)&data=02%7C01%7C%7C9de0747ce34b4a52b97308d52de7eb57%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636465396470480819&sdata=QNU3oV%2F7CHphXPOJP1me5FAbLeAlj0F1taiBdQFDmO0%3D&reserved=0>
> and discussed on the November 20 call (https://www.w3.org/2017/11/
> 20-ag-minutes.html#item02).
>
>
>
> The new proposed SC test is:
>
> “Content does not restrict its view and operation to a single display
> orientation, such as portrait or landscape, unless a specific display
> orientation is essential.”
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> AWK
>
>
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
>
> Adobe
>
>
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
>
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7C%7C54093524ef264326424008d51cd66c05%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636446629619786436&sdata=c5UP0xiniJIppvd6Esu1XA%2FbX1ykpABkhgCCmBp%2Fht8%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> https://www.w3.org/2017/11/20-ag-minutes.html#item02
>