Re: Revert Adapting text language replacing "adapt" with "change"

>I​
t doesn’t eliminate the use of the word “essential”, which is not here used
in accordance with its WCAG definition.

T
​hat word is in both proposals so I think we should consider that
separately... perhaps you can file an issue on github.​

>  It doesn’t address Andrew’s scenario in which the spacing parameters
supplied by the author already meet or exceed those requested in the
success criterion. I agree with Andrew that the content should pass the SC
in such a case.

​Why wouldn't it pass? The 4 things are states ​


   - It line height is already 1.5 times the font size then it would pass
   that bullet
   - if the spacing is already 2 times the font size it passes without
   further adjustment
   - ​if letter psacing is .12  times the font size it passes already
   - if word spacing is .16 times the font size then it would pass​


​

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
Mobile:  613.806.9005

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:37 PM, White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> *From:* David MacDonald [mailto:david@can-adapt.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, November 13, 2017 12:19 PM
>
> If the technologies being used allow the user agent to change text style
> properties, then no loss of essential content or functionality occurs by
> changing all of the following:
>
> * the 4 things
>
> *[Jason] Two problems:*
>
>    1. It doesn’t address Andrew’s scenario in which the spacing
>    parameters supplied by the author already meet or exceed those requested in
>    the success criterion. I agree with Andrew that the content should pass the
>    SC in such a case.
>    2. It doesn’t eliminate the use of the word “essential”, which is not
>    here used in accordance with its WCAG definition.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or
> confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom
> it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail
> in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or
> take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete
> it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
>
> Thank you for your compliance.
> ------------------------------
>