From: David MacDonald [mailto:david@can-adapt.com] Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 12:19 PM If the technologies being used allow the user agent to change text style properties, then no loss of essential content or functionality occurs by changing all of the following: * the 4 things [Jason] Two problems: 1. It doesn’t address Andrew’s scenario in which the spacing parameters supplied by the author already meet or exceed those requested in the success criterion. I agree with Andrew that the content should pass the SC in such a case. 2. It doesn’t eliminate the use of the word “essential”, which is not here used in accordance with its WCAG definition. ________________________________ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited. Thank you for your compliance. ________________________________Received on Monday, 13 November 2017 17:38:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:18 UTC