Re: CFC - NEW Proposed definition for 'Programatic Notification'

+1

/Denis

--
Denis Boudreau,
Principal accessibility consultant & trainer
Deque Systems, Inc.
Cell: +1-514-730-9168
Email: denis.boudreau@deque.com [mailto:denis.boudreau@deque.com]

Keep in touch: @dboudreau [http://www.twitter.com/dboudreau]


On 2017-10-20 3:31:06 PM, Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com> wrote:
+1

glenda sims | team a11y lead | deque.com [http://deque.com] | 512.963.3773
web for everyone. web on everything. - w3 goals

[ IAAP International Association of Accessibility Professionals: Certified Professional in Accessibility Core Competencies (CPACC)] [http://www.accessibilityassociation.org/certification]


On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie [mailto:josh@interaccess.ie]> wrote:

Call For Consensus — ends Friday October 20th at 1:00pm Boston time.

The Working Group has a proposed change to SC 2.6.2 Orientation [1]

from:

" Content is not locked to a specific display orientation, and functionality of the content is operable in all display orientations, except where display orientation is essential for use of the content."

to

"Content is operable in all display orientations supported by the user agent, except where display orientation is essential".

Original Github issue can be viewed here: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/70 [https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/commit/b5c68e17f82feb0cdbbafc273f245b136a7445c4]

This was discussed on todays call: https://www.w3.org/2017/10/17-ag-minutes.html#item03 [https://www.w3.org/2017/10/17-ag-minutes.html#item03]


If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.

[1] https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#orientation [https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#orientation]


Thanks


--
Joshue O Connor
Director | InterAccess.ie