+1 Reads better!
On Tuesday, October 17, 2017 4:08 PM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> wrote:
+1
Cheers,
David MacDonald CanAdapt Solutions Inc.Tel: 613.235.4902LinkedIn
twitter.com/davidmacdGitHubwww.Can-Adapt.com Adapting the web to all users Including those with disabilities
If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 2:23 PM, ALAN SMITH <alands289@gmail.com> wrote:
+1 Alan Smith From: Joshue O Connor
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 1:09 PM
To: WCAG
Subject: CFC - NEW Proposed definition for 'Programatic Notification' Call For Consensus — ends Friday October 20th at 1:00pm Boston time. The Working Group has a proposed change to SC 2.6.2 Orientation [1]
from:
" Content is not locked to a specific display orientation, and functionality of the content is operable in all display orientations, except where display orientation is essential for use of the content."
to
"Content is operable in all display orientations supported by the user agent, except where display orientation is essential".
Original Github issue can be viewed here: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/ issues/70 This was discussed on todays call: https://www.w3.org/2017/10/17- ag-minutes.html#item03 If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.
[1] https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/# orientation Thanks--
Joshue O Connor
Director | InterAccess.ie
Received on Thursday, 19 October 2017 13:12:10 UTC