Re: CFC - NEW Proposed definition for 'Programatic Notification'

+1

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 2:23 PM, ALAN SMITH <alands289@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
>
>
> Alan Smith
>
>
>
> *From: *Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>
> *Sent: *Tuesday, October 17, 2017 1:09 PM
> *To: *WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> *Subject: *CFC - NEW Proposed definition for 'Programatic Notification'
>
>
>
> Call For Consensus — ends Friday October 20th at 1:00pm Boston time.
>
>
>
> The Working Group has a proposed change to SC 2.6.2 Orientation [1]
>
> from:
>
> " Content is not locked to a specific display orientation, and
> functionality of the content is operable in all display orientations,
> except where display orientation is essential for use of the content."
>
> to
>
> "Content is operable in all display orientations supported by the user
> agent, except where display orientation is essential".
>
> Original Github issue can be viewed here: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/
> issues/70
> <https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/commit/b5c68e17f82feb0cdbbafc273f245b136a7445c4>
>
>
>
> This was discussed on todays call: https://www.w3.org/2017/10/17-
> ag-minutes.html#item03
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#orientation
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Joshue O Connor
> Director *| InterAccess.ie *
>
>
>