- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 14:07:40 +0000
- To: Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>, "david@can-adapt.com" <david@can-adapt.com>, "team-wcag-editors@w3.org" <team-wcag-editors@w3.org>, "cooper@w3.org" <cooper@w3.org>
- CC: "wilco.fiers@deque.com" <wilco.fiers@deque.com>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Detlev wrote: > I had a look at the mockup and I fear an ID: 1.4(21)2 is not easy to understand let alone speak. How would you refer to that? The point would be that we don't (at least in conversation!), the reference would be the short-name / ID. I'm suggesting that with the de-emphasis of the numbers, we use the same scheme that we have now, so the new zoom one would be 1.4.10. However, with the numbers de-emphasised, we could have the numbers out of order and maintain the level-order, with the new ones at the bottom of each appropriate level. (Or, within the level-order, would could then order them in a more meaningful way. For example, the colour contrast ones come together.) Cheers, -Alastair
Received on Wednesday, 20 September 2017 14:08:10 UTC