- From: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 09:46:08 -0500
- To: Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com>
- Cc: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>, "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org>, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>, "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKdCpxzj1JUyZqhE29QnG+3Q0MF625OyLvkjNuBcL7ECi0zd-w@mail.gmail.com>
+1 to Katie's point. JF On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com > wrote: > While updating 2.1.1 *seems* like a good idea, I have to caution against > changing any 2.0 SC in a dot release. Documentation and tools worldwide > will need to be updated as opposed to just adding a new requirement. > > ** katie ** > > > > *Katie Haritos-Shea* > *Principal ICT Accessibility Architect**,* *IAAP **CPACC* > <http://www.accessibilityassociation.org/recentlycertified>* > (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)* > > > > *Cell: 703-371-5545 <(703)%20371-5545> **|* *ryladog@gmail.com* > <ryladog@gmail.com> *|* *Oakton, VA **|* *LinkedIn Profile* > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/> *|* *Office: 703-371-5545 > <(703)%20371-5545> **|* *@ryladog* <https://twitter.com/Ryladog> > > NOTE: The content of this email should be construed to always be an > expression of my own personal independent opinion, unless I identify that I > am speaking on behalf of Knowbility, as their AC Rep at the W3C - and - > that my personal email never expresses the opinion of my employer, Deque > Systems. > > > > *From:* Joshue O Connor [mailto:josh@interaccess.ie] > *Sent:* Monday, August 28, 2017 9:58 AM > *To:* White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org> > *Cc:* David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>; Patrick H. Lauke < > redux@splintered.co.uk>; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > > *Subject:* Re: CFC - Device Sensors > > > > White, Jason J wrote: > > I share David’s concerns. I think that not filtering the list of SCs more > effectively at this stage is just postponing the hard decisions and > creating a lot of work for us as we move toward Candidate Recommendation. > > That is something we want to avoid. If I'm reading this all correctly, I'm > keen on your idea of an exception to 2.1.1 that covers sensors - or at > least some of the current use cases (thanks Kim). > > My problem/reservation with that is the approach is an implicit way of > dealing with these use cases and not a more 'visible' SC that is future > proof when it comes to more 'sensor aware' technologies. Hence my bringing > this whole thing up again. > > I'm quite torn on this one tbh. > > Thanks > > Josh > > > > *From:* David MacDonald [mailto:david100@sympatico.ca > <david100@sympatico.ca>] > *Sent:* Saturday, August 26, 2017 9:35 AM > *To:* Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie> <josh@interaccess.ie>; > Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> <redux@splintered.co.uk>; > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > *Subject:* Re: CFC - Device Sensors > > > > I had objected to the SC on survey... citing redundancy with 2.1.1 > > > > However, I reluctantly provided consensus. I still hold to that. However > my big concern is that we only have a couple of months the vet 23 success > criteria and put them in the shape that is ready for a formal > consideration. We also have to write techniques and the understanding > sections. There are several success criteria I didn't have strong > consensus and I am concerned about the amount of bandwidth they will take > up once we get into the thick of finalization. > > > > So my hope is that this concern will be respected and that we will not > lose too much bandwidth on the success criteria that we let pass-through. > If so I would strongly object proceeding with this one. > > > > On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 7:55 AM Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie> > wrote: > > Thanks Patrick, yes, I'd be happy to see that. Do others agree to this > approach? > > > > Thanks > > > > Josh > > > > InterAccess - Accessible UX > > > > -------- Original message -------- > > From: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk> > > Date: 26/08/2017 12:27 (GMT+00:00) > > To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > > Subject: Re: CFC - Device Sensors > > > > On 26/08/2017 10:44, Joshue O Connor wrote: > [...] > > So, I'm concerned that if we do not now get wider review we risk > > throwing the baby out with the bathwater. I'm actually not comfortable > > taking the opportunity for wider review when what seems like an > > interesting/progressive SC is on the table. > > Any chance of adding a prominent editorial note in the draft pointing > out that the exact wording is under review due to potential scope issues? > > P > -- > Patrick H. Lauke > > www.splintered.co.uk > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.splintered.co.uk&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7Ca1e9482570f1413ea1cc08d4ec8763ec%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636393513638044677&sdata=sSG6u8Hf53Q8GaY31T8cnX7hPINwhrj9tpR1gLyEy2c%3D&reserved=0> > | https://github.com/patrickhlauke > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fpatrickhlauke&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7Ca1e9482570f1413ea1cc08d4ec8763ec%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636393513638044677&sdata=EK9xbI0MkIqs1MNj7XXFByXYOkf6kWE8%2FZLHifqQWC8%3D&reserved=0> > http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflickr.com%2Fphotos%2Fredux%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7Ca1e9482570f1413ea1cc08d4ec8763ec%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636393513638044677&sdata=YKcmP5xYGUjg%2BvVxayT4FYZ9uakXFmmZ%2BG5Rpc8uDzY%3D&reserved=0> > | http://redux.deviantart.com > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fredux.deviantart.com&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7Ca1e9482570f1413ea1cc08d4ec8763ec%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636393513638044677&sdata=BaVForXb7ZJ8Tj94ZcUOzf9S9t%2BcECUGc9oWRWbliu0%3D&reserved=0> > twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke > > -- > > Cheers, > David MacDonald > > > > *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* > > Tel: 613.235.4902 <(613)%20235-4902> > > LinkedIn > > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Fdavidmacdonald100&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7Ca1e9482570f1413ea1cc08d4ec8763ec%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636393513638044677&sdata=BEmffR3fanUAszNRNy6enllf2HoQLQ%2BRgTSZ9u1x6PY%3D&reserved=0> > > twitter.com/davidmacd > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fdavidmacd&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7Ca1e9482570f1413ea1cc08d4ec8763ec%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636393513638044677&sdata=Xmpegt0vrW%2BEic1TizzrokwnEC%2BzD%2FgX6vfnabSZ3Xk%3D&reserved=0> > > GitHub > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FDavidMacDonald&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7Ca1e9482570f1413ea1cc08d4ec8763ec%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636393513638044677&sdata=kYx6VbenhhJOT1JKcPHXHbLbrvpEucMmjsW4pMUNUic%3D&reserved=0> > > www.Can-Adapt.com > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.can-adapt.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7Ca1e9482570f1413ea1cc08d4ec8763ec%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636393513638044677&sdata=Py%2Fa1SOPj%2FIV5R4JkYgSVTp30EegAy13p%2BcSlzyqXXQ%3D&reserved=0> > > > > * Adapting the web to all users* > > * Including those with disabilities* > > > > If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidmacd.com%2Fdisclaimer.html&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7Ca1e9482570f1413ea1cc08d4ec8763ec%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636393513638044677&sdata=vLcc0RRERhFToOxmZZRjA5%2Fe06RYtXsjXyQ2uNqq2z4%3D&reserved=0> > > > ------------------------------ > > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or > confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom > it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail > in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or > take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete > it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited. > > > > Thank you for your compliance. > ------------------------------ > > > > -- > Joshue O Connor > Director *| InterAccess.ie * > -- John Foliot Principal Accessibility Strategist Deque Systems Inc. john.foliot@deque.com Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion
Received on Monday, 28 August 2017 14:46:32 UTC