RE: CFC - Device Sensors

I share David’s concerns. I think that not filtering the list of SCs more effectively at this stage is just postponing the hard decisions and creating a lot of work for us as we move toward Candidate Recommendation.

From: David MacDonald []
Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2017 9:35 AM
To: Joshue O Connor <>; Patrick H. Lauke <>;
Subject: Re: CFC - Device Sensors

I had objected to the SC on survey... citing redundancy with 2.1.1

However, I reluctantly provided consensus. I still hold to that. However my big concern is that we only have a couple of months the vet 23 success criteria and put them in the shape that is ready for a formal consideration. We also have to write techniques and the understanding  sections. There are several success criteria I didn't have strong consensus and I am concerned about the amount of bandwidth they will take up once we get into the thick of finalization.

 So my hope is that this concern will be respected and that we will not lose too much bandwidth on the success criteria that we let pass-through. If so I would strongly object proceeding with this one.

On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 7:55 AM Joshue O Connor <<>> wrote:
Thanks Patrick, yes, I'd be happy to see that. Do others agree to this approach?



InterAccess - Accessible UX

-------- Original message --------
From: "Patrick H. Lauke" <<>>
Date: 26/08/2017 12:27 (GMT+00:00)
Subject: Re: CFC - Device Sensors

On 26/08/2017 10:44, Joshue O Connor wrote:
> So, I'm concerned that if we do not now get wider review we risk
> throwing the baby out with the bathwater. I'm actually not comfortable
> taking the opportunity for wider review when what seems like an
> interesting/progressive SC is on the table.

Any chance of adding a prominent editorial note in the draft pointing
out that the exact wording is under review due to potential scope issues?

Patrick H. Lauke<> |<><> |<>
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

David MacDonald

CanAdapt Solutions Inc.

Tel:  613.235.4902



  Adapting the web to all users
            Including those with disabilities

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy<>


This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.

Thank you for your compliance.


Received on Monday, 28 August 2017 13:46:39 UTC