Re: Where we stand on Animations SC #18

In general we wouldn't provide a definition unless we mean something
specific or different from a general definition.

So let's go without one and see what comes back during review. I like
scaling better than sizing...

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
Mobile:  613.806.9005

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
wrote:

> Hi David,
>
>
>
> I’m not sure what definition we’d use for motion & scaling beyond the
> dictionary ones?
>
>    - Motion: the action or process of moving or of changing place or
>    position; movement.
>    - Scaling: the [change of] size or extent of something especially in
>    comparison to something else
>    - (From CSS docs) Scaling: An increase or decrease in size.
>
>
>
> For motion the dictionary definition is it, scaling less so. Would
> “sizing” work better than scaling?
>
>
>
> “For non-essential motion or* sizing* animations triggered by a user
> action…”
>
>
>
> Would that negate the need for a definition?
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *David MacDonald
>
>
>
> I support the new wording, with a definition for motion and scaling
>
>
>
>
>
>
>