Re: Definition of "target" in "target size"

I'm fine with that.

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 1:55 PM, White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> *From:* David MacDonald [mailto:david100@sympatico.ca]
> *Sent:* Monday, August 7, 2017 1:23 PM
>
> Could probably just switch "touch" with "pointer"
>
> *[Jason] I think Andrew has it right, as long as this is consistent with
> what the working group’s participants intend. It wasn’t clear to me what
> was intended, although I do recall discussion of applying it to pointer
> actions in general, as is reflected in the text of the SC, instead of
> limiting it to touch events.*
>
> ------------------------------
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or
> confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom
> it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail
> in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or
> take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete
> it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
>
> Thank you for your compliance.
> ------------------------------
>

Received on Monday, 7 August 2017 19:09:23 UTC