- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 16:08:55 -0400
- To: "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
- Cc: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com>, "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org>, "W3c-Wai-Gl-Request@W3. Org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAdDpDadAbsan=v00zEhYz_3-Xbe28N7Jb7AwavusV_6HO2CsQ@mail.gmail.com>
> Can you think of cases were it is not reasonable as currently written? There are so many millions of actions performed on the web that I can't imagine a list and a way that we can say something so broad without flinching at what comes back at us . I think the bullet exceptions would have to be something like these but of course can't be this wording. * The action is REALLY hard to undo * The action cannot technically be undone without significant modifications to the architecture or code base * The action doesn't make sense to undo. Its basically the undue burden thing. Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 3:34 PM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote: > There are a lot of exceptions. Can you think of cases were it is not > reasonable as currently written? > > > > All the best > > Lisa Seeman > > LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter > <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa> > > > > > ---- On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 16:58:17 +0300 *David > MacDonald<david100@sympatico.ca <david100@sympatico.ca>>* wrote ---- > > I don't think its realistic on today's web to reverse EVERY action, > especially in a DOT release of WCAG. It would be a momentous change and > huge requirement. > > I think as technology improves web sites will provide more and more undo > actions because its good usability. But we are not there yet. > > Cheers, > David MacDonald > > > > *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* > > Tel: 613.235.4902 <(613)%20235-4902> > > LinkedIn > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> > > twitter.com/davidmacd > > GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> > > http://www.can-adapt.com/ > > > > * Adapting the web to all users* > * Including those with disabilities* > > If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy > <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> > wrote: > > In a web-mail context, I think the usual solution is to go to the 'trash', > where email is stored for a while. > > I agree that undo on text-entry (like a wysiwyg editor) is useful, but > saying that you could go back a page (or three) and then undo changes in a > text area? That's another matter. > > Cheers, > > -Alastair > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 19 July 2017 20:09:20 UTC