Re: new wording for Undo

There are a lot of exceptions. Can you think of cases were it is not reasonable as currently written?



All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn, Twitter





---- On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 16:58:17 +0300 David MacDonald<david100@sympatico.ca> wrote ---- 

I don't think its realistic on today's web to reverse EVERY action, especially in a DOT release of WCAG. It would be a momentous change and huge requirement.


I think as technology improves web sites will provide more and more undo actions because its good usability. But we are not there yet.


Cheers,
David MacDonald
 
CanAdapt Solutions Inc.
Tel:  613.235.4902
LinkedIn 

twitter.com/davidmacd
GitHub
http://www.can-adapt.com/
  
  Adapting the web to all users
            Including those with disabilities


If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy






 
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote:
     In a web-mail context, I think the usual solution is to go to the 'trash', where email is stored for a while.
 
 
 I agree that undo on text-entry (like a wysiwyg editor) is useful, but saying that you could go back a page (or three) and then undo changes in a text area? That's another matter.
 
 
 Cheers,
 
 
 -Alastair