- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 14:08:53 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
On 14/07/2017 18:00, David MacDonald wrote: > > > * if a user actively chooses a setting on the page that optimizes or > personalizes the state of the page for accessibility reasons, this > new state does not necessarily need to conform, because the > conforming version can be reached by undoing the setting. > > > Jonathan says: > > I can’t agree with this. What this is saying is that if I adjust the > page to 200% zoom to read the content and it is no longer accessible > that is ok because I chose to zoom in. You are telling me I can use the > unzoomed accessible version of the page – but it’s not accessible > because I can’t because the text can’t be resized to 200%.____ > > __ > > David says: > > > This was Patrick's addition so perhaps I'll let him speak to that. When did I make this addition? Is this going back to that discussion 2 years ago or whenever? In any case, reading the above I'd note that it says "setting ON the page", i.e. some personalization/optimization option provided by the site itself (like a link to desktop version I believe may have been the original point of discussion way back when). If the user changes their user agent's zoom setting then they haven't used a "setting ON the page" but in their UA, so that won't be a loophole? P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Sunday, 16 July 2017 13:09:22 UTC