W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: SC Managers and success criteria review

From: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:35:24 +0200
To: "David MacDonald" <david100@sympatico.ca>
Cc: "Alastair Campbell" <acampbell@nomensa.com>, "Joshue O Connor" <josh@interaccess.ie>, "WCAG" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1590354bfea.e417153d102467.5415541154518439526@zoho.com>
Where have these acceptance criteria come from?  Why are they not the same as the ones iterated at https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.1_Success_Criteria?
Also I disagree with your analysis / review of the SC. Do you have a spread sheet or page were you iterate why you feel some of the SC fail?  

All the best
Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn, Twitter

---- On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 17:49:08 +0200 David MacDonald&lt;david100@sympatico.ca&gt; wrote ---- 

I've done that for the 63 Success Criteria proposals

Except it was not a thumbs up/down. It is 8 checkboxes next to each SC for each of the Acceptance Criteria. In order to publish, I suggest the SCs need to meet this minimum bar. 

In the details tab. There are now 9 new columns with "Yes" in the corresponding cells

1) Disproportionate Barrier for PWD
2) Testable
3) Condition not method 
4) WCAG Structure
5) Backward Compatible
6) Applies to all content
7) All Technologies
8) Not Covered in WCAG 2
9) Implementable

The Summary page has a list of all those that seem to meet these currently.

David MacDonald 
CanAdapt Solutions Inc.
Tel:  613.235.4902LinkedIn 

  Adapting the web to all users
            Including those with disabilities

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Alastair Campbell &lt;acampbell@nomensa.com&gt; wrote:
As Josh said the first action for people is to pick one or two SCs to manage.
 For those quick off the mark, I'd suggest the second action is to review a few other SCs from the list? Just an initial thumbs up, or questions / comments.
 I did about half the MATF ones in about 3 hours tonight, they varied in time depending on complexity, but it was interesting to go through.
 To spread it out between people, I suggest sorting by least activity:
 Once each has a few comments, we'll get a better idea of the shape of things...
 From: Joshue O Connor &lt;josh@interaccess.ie&gt;
 Sent: 13 December 2016 17:48
 Subject: SC Managers and success criteria review
 Hi all,
 On the call today we further discussed the role of the 'SC Manager'. The group members on the call were happy with this direction.
 In a nut shell - the SC manager will drive the development, the iteration, acceptance, or deletion of a candidate SC. You can find out more here, as well as sign up for an SC yourself if you are interested in taking up this work. [1]
 Thanks to those who have already signed up.
 Comments/questions welcome!
 [1] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/SC_Managers_Phase1

Received on Thursday, 15 December 2016 16:36:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:07 UTC