W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2016

RE: Survey Format suggestions, Adding Acceptance Criteria for SCs in Survey

From: Vivienne Conway <v.conway@webkeyit.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 09:14:06 +0800
To: "'David MacDonald'" <david@can-adapt.com>, "'WCAG'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "'WCAG Editors'" <team-wcag-editors@w3.org>
Message-ID: <06f301d254de$338ae820$9aa0b860$@webkeyit.com>
Great idea David.

 

 

 

Regards,

 

Vivienne Conway, Ph.D., B.IT (Hons), MACS (Snr) CP, AALIA(CS)

Director

 

Please be advised that I check my emails at approximately 9am and 4pm each day (more or less).  If you require assistance sooner, please feel free to telephone.

 

 

Web Key IT Pty Ltd

PO BOX 681 Wanneroo, WA 6946

Phone: (08) 9206 3987

Mobile    0415 383 673   

Facsimile   (08) 9325 6422

 

E      v.conway@webkeyit.com <mailto:v.conway@webkeyit.com>  

W    www.webkeyit.com <http://www.webkeyit.com/>  

 

 



 

This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely for the named addressee. It is confidential and may be subject to legal professional privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact me immediately by reply email, delete it from your system and destroy any copies. This email is subject to copyright, no part of it should be reproduced, adapted or transmitted without the prior written consent of the copyright owner. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of Web Key IT Pty Ltd.

 

 

From: David MacDonald [mailto:david@can-adapt.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, 13 December 2016 5:46 AM
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>; WCAG Editors <team-wcag-editors@w3.org>
Subject: Survey Format suggestions, Adding Acceptance Criteria for SCs in Survey

 

I'd like to propose an addition to all surveys for Success Criteria. I think each new SC proposal could have a yes/no radio question for each of the Acceptance Criteria for SCs followed by an additional comments text field

 

1.    Does it address a situation where a user with a disability will be disproportionately disadvantaged (as compared to a user without a disability) if the criteria is not met?  (Yes/No Radio)

2.    Is it be testable through automated or manual processes. (Yes/No Radio)

3.    Does it describe the specific condition required to meet the criteria, not the method to address the criteria. (Yes/No Radio)

4.    Does it utilize the WCAG 2.0 A/AA/AAA level structure. (Yes/No Radio)

5.    Does it ensure for revised Success Criteria that pages that meet the revised guidance continue to meet the corresponding WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria. (Yes/No Radio)

6.    Does it apply to all content unless preconditions for the application of the success criteria are explicitly identified (e.g. "except interruptions involving an emergency"). (Yes/No Radio)

7.    Does it apply across technologies to the greatest extent possible. (Technology-specific issues should usually be addressed in Techniques.) (Yes/No Radio)

8.    Does it avoid creating a requirement for something that is already required by an existing Success Criterion. (Yes/No Radio)

9.    Does it have Success Techniques which demonstrate that each Success Criterion is implementable, using readily-available formats, user agents, and assistive technologies. (Yes/No Radio)

 

Comments

[Text box]

 

 


 https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.1_Success_Criteria  

 

 

Cheers,
David MacDonald

 

CanAdapt Solutions Inc.

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn  <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> 


twitter.com/davidmacd <http://twitter.com/davidmacd> 

 <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> GitHub

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>  

   

  Adapting the web to all users

            Including those with disabilities

 

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> 

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> 
Version: 2016.0.7924 / Virus Database: 4739/13581 - Release Date: 12/12/16

  _____  

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> 
Version: 2016.0.7924 / Virus Database: 4728/13553 - Release Date: 12/07/16


image001.png
(image/png attachment: image001.png)

Received on Tuesday, 13 December 2016 01:14:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:07 UTC