W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: read the whole thing ?

From: Thaddeus . <inclusivethinking@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 09:27:43 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOh2y+9sd-1QJ03Szy=LpuhWw+H6_keJmuXVjoFePzuT-soFPw@mail.gmail.com>
To: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
Cc: "lisa. seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, W3c-Wai-Gl <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Sorry that is typo from autocomplete

+1 For Lisa's suggestion to create FAQs.
On Dec 2, 2016 5:09 AM, "David MacDonald" <david100@sympatico.ca> wrote:

> Sorry, what does the acronym FAC stand for?
>
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>
>
>
> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
> Tel:  613.235.4902 <(613)%20235-4902>
>
> LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>
> twitter.com/davidmacd
>
> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>
> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>
>
>
> *  Adapting the web to all users*
> *            Including those with disabilities*
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Thaddeus . <inclusivethinking@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> + 1 For FACs
>>
>> Thaddeus
>> On Dec 2, 2016 3:08 AM, "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi Folks
>>>
>>> We have tried to address the issues that are likely to be raised in the
>>> benefits sections
>>>
>>> Please read the whole thing if you can before asking questions.
>>>
>>> I also want to write an FAQ's to answer common questions as there arise.
>>> Will that be useful?
>>>
>>>
>>> All the best
>>>
>>> Lisa Seeman
>>>
>>> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter
>>> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---- On Fri, 02 Dec 2016 12:10:42 +0200 *<josh@interaccess.ie
>>> <josh@interaccess.ie>>* wrote ----
>>>
>>> To be serious, yes - we do appreciated that there is a lot to do and it
>>> is a big ask for the group. We will be staggering the items that are for
>>> review so we hope this will make things a little easier. Actually, we
>>> are really looking for 'provisional approval' of these new SCs at this
>>> point, so these SCs are the first tranche  'candidates' and this phase is
>>> a really a first pass.
>>>
>>> In this pass we aim to whittle these down, reduce duplication, identify
>>> where SCs from TFs are related and can be merged etc.
>>> Then identify sets that will be chosen for any final cut. So this is a
>>> rough overview of what we will be doing. So, lets all take a deep breath,
>>> roll up our sleeves etc.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Josh
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
Received on Friday, 2 December 2016 17:28:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:07 UTC