RE: Re[2]: 75 SCs to vet in 12 weeks.

Dang David! You rock! Now go to sleep….:-)

 

​​​​​

 

 

 

* katie *

 

Katie Haritos-Shea 
Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)

 

Cell: 703-371-5545 |  <mailto:ryladog@gmail.com> ryladog@gmail.com | Oakton, VA |  <http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/> LinkedIn Profile | Office: 703-371-5545 |  <https://twitter.com/Ryladog> @ryladog

 

From: David MacDonald [mailto:david100@sympatico.ca] 
Sent: Friday, December 2, 2016 8:47 AM
To: josh@interaccess.ie; Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Re[2]: 75 SCs to vet in 12 weeks.

 

The tiny URL for that analysis is here

Tiny URL
http://tinyurl.com/jmo9st4

There are two worksheets in the Workbook. One is a summary (like above) and the other is the details of the SCs







Cheers,
David MacDonald

 

CanAdapt Solutions Inc.

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>  


twitter.com/davidmacd <http://twitter.com/davidmacd> 

 <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> GitHub

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> 

  

  Adapting the web to all users

            Including those with disabilities

 

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> 

 

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:26 AM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca <mailto:david100@sympatico.ca> > wrote:

I've gone over all the Success Criteria looking for Overlaps.

Surprisingly there's not that much overlap. I've thrown the net pretty wide and only come up with the following possible combinations of overlap.

- Issue 10 LVTF and 36 COGA
- Issue 8 LVTF, 51 COGA, 78 LVTF, 26 COGA
- Issue 2 MATF and 54 COGA
- Issue 18 ADHOC, and 6 COGA

There may be opportunities to combine SCs within a task for from 2 or 3 short to a longer one, but that would be a different analysis.

 

 
 
 
 

 




Cheers,
David MacDonald

 

CanAdapt Solutions Inc.

Tel:  613.235.4902 <tel:613.235.4902> 

LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>  


twitter.com/davidmacd <http://twitter.com/davidmacd> 

 <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> GitHub

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> 

  

  Adapting the web to all users

            Including those with disabilities

 

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> 

 

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 7:26 AM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca <mailto:david100@sympatico.ca> > wrote:

​>>Josh says: Just get started dude!


I pulled an all nighter and started the analysis​

 

======

MATF = 15

Level A = 9

Level AA = 6


========

LVTF = 13

Level A = 6

Level AA = 7

============
COGA = 38

Level A = 16

Level AA = 19

Level AAA = 2

Unassigned level = 1 (Issue 39)

Of those 4 modify AAA and move to AA
Of those 4 modify AAA and move to A


============

DPUB = 1 

DPUB still writing SC


=====

AD HOC = 1

Level A = 1

I've put up a Google Sheet to try to organize these and analyze:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XShLFX8fxHYYLn8A6avDwu37w9JfnZCGWvAKBpK9Xo4/edit?usp=sharing


Tiny URL
http://tinyurl.com/jmo9st4

There are two worksheets in the Workbook. One is a summary (like above) and the other is the details of the SCs




Cheers,
David MacDonald

 

CanAdapt Solutions Inc.

Tel:  613.235.4902 <tel:613.235.4902> 

LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>  


twitter.com/davidmacd <http://twitter.com/davidmacd> 

 <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> GitHub

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> 

  

  Adapting the web to all users

            Including those with disabilities

 

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> 

 

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 5:11 AM, josh@interaccess.ie <mailto:josh@interaccess.ie>  <josh@interaccess.ie <mailto:josh@interaccess.ie> > wrote:

To be serious, yes - we do appreciated that there is a lot to do and it is a big ask for the group. We will be staggering the items that are for review so we hope this will make things a little easier. Actually, we are really looking for 'provisional approval' of these new SCs at this point, so these SCs are the first tranche  'candidates' and this phase is a really a first pass.

 

In this pass we aim to whittle these down, reduce duplication, identify where SCs from TFs are related and can be merged etc.

Then identify sets that will be chosen for any final cut. So this is a rough overview of what we will be doing. So, lets all take a deep breath, roll up our sleeves etc.

 

Thanks

 

Josh