W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: Re[2]: 75 SCs to vet in 12 weeks.

From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 08:46:46 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAdDpDb-NAA9L2OrP9G3gDQceamfLaw=xPpLoMTWTU53zRZfew@mail.gmail.com>
To: "josh@interaccess.ie" <josh@interaccess.ie>, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
The tiny URL for that analysis is here

Tiny URL
http://tinyurl.com/jmo9st4

There are two worksheets in the Workbook. One is a summary (like above) and
the other is the details of the SCs




Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:26 AM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
wrote:

> I've gone over all the Success Criteria looking for Overlaps.
>
> Surprisingly there's not that much overlap. I've thrown the net pretty
> wide and only come up with the following possible combinations of overlap.
>
> - Issue 10 LVTF and 36 COGA
> - Issue 8 LVTF, 51 COGA, 78 LVTF, 26 COGA
> - Issue 2 MATF and 54 COGA
> - Issue 18 ADHOC, and 6 COGA
>
> There may be opportunities to combine SCs within a task for from 2 or 3
> short to a longer one, but that would be a different analysis.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>
>
>
> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
> Tel:  613.235.4902
>
> LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>
> twitter.com/davidmacd
>
> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>
> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>
>
>
> *  Adapting the web to all users*
> *            Including those with disabilities*
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 7:26 AM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
>
>> ​>>Josh says: Just get started dude!
>>
>> I pulled an all nighter and started the analysis​
>>
>> ======
>> MATF = 15
>> Level A = 9
>> Level AA = 6
>>
>> ========
>> LVTF = 13
>> Level A = 6
>> Level AA = 7
>>
>> ============
>> COGA = 38
>> Level A = 16
>> Level AA = 19
>> Level AAA = 2
>> Unassigned level = 1 (Issue 39)
>> Of those 4 modify AAA and move to AA
>> Of those 4 modify AAA and move to A
>>
>> ============
>> DPUB = 1
>> DPUB still writing SC
>>
>> =====
>> AD HOC = 1
>> Level A = 1
>>
>> I've put up a Google Sheet to try to organize these and analyze:
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XShLFX8fxHYYLn8A6avD
>> wu37w9JfnZCGWvAKBpK9Xo4/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>> Tiny URL
>> http://tinyurl.com/jmo9st4
>>
>> There are two worksheets in the Workbook. One is a summary (like above)
>> and the other is the details of the SCs
>>
>> Cheers,
>> David MacDonald
>>
>>
>>
>> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
>> Tel:  613.235.4902
>>
>> LinkedIn
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>>
>> twitter.com/davidmacd
>>
>> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>>
>> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>>
>>
>>
>> *  Adapting the web to all users*
>> *            Including those with disabilities*
>>
>> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
>> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 5:11 AM, josh@interaccess.ie <josh@interaccess.ie>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> To be serious, yes - we do appreciated that there is a lot to do and it
>>> is a big ask for the group. We will be staggering the items that are for
>>> review so we hope this will make things a little easier. Actually, we
>>> are really looking for 'provisional approval' of these new SCs at this
>>> point, so these SCs are the first tranche  'candidates' and this phase is
>>> a really a first pass.
>>>
>>> In this pass we aim to whittle these down, reduce duplication, identify
>>> where SCs from TFs are related and can be merged etc.
>>> Then identify sets that will be chosen for any final cut. So this is a
>>> rough overview of what we will be doing. So, lets all take a deep breath,
>>> roll up our sleeves etc.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Josh
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Received on Friday, 2 December 2016 13:47:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:07 UTC