W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: Adding a non-task force SC

From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 13:48:39 +0000
To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, WCAG WG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5D806EA9-0603-4634-A2B8-2E7974E4F98F@adobe.com>
Right now the purpose of the issues in the WCAG 2.1 repo (http://github.com/w3c/wcag21) is for proposals for new SC in WCAG 2.1.

Feel free to add it there, taking a look at issue 1 as the guide to the format.

Regarding the animation SC, my initial take is that the way to make this acceptable to stakeholders we need to have a way for authors to use animation (in some cases it may provide benefit to some users) and a way for end-users to turn it off or limit it. Can users turn it off today in the same way that many low-vision users do to modify the appearance of web content with custom style sheets? (I don’t know the answers to these questions). I’m sure that we can do more in Silver when we can speak to user agent requirements better, but we can discuss the problem and the solution and see what we can do for 2.1.


Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility


From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com<mailto:acampbell@nomensa.com>>
Date: Friday, November 18, 2016 at 08:08
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Subject: Adding a non-task force SC
Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Friday, November 18, 2016 at 08:08


A brief process question: For a non task-force SC, what is the next step to get it included for consideration in 2.1?

E.g. this one:

Do I need to add it to github?

If anyone has any feedback on that proposed SC first, I would appreciate it soon…


Received on Friday, 18 November 2016 13:49:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:07 UTC