- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:48:12 -0500
- To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAdDpDbS2KQ-hh8W6Z2jeS7nCunrfMBaHcMhU3ZjVw3aeCy_3g@mail.gmail.com>
Having gone to the experience of putting out a draft that had 1200 comments, I can say that we do not want to put a draft out that has that kind of response. We want to put it something that is reasonably well vetted. Otherwise, the group spends a year and a half clearing the comments, literally. Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > David wrote: > > “Anyway, we have a First Public Working draft of 2.1 due in 12-15 weeks. > It will be our first major statement in 8 years... the world is > watching.... are we ready?” > > > > I think you’ve pretty much answered your own question with the pre-amble: > > WCAG 2.0 in 2006 “was not ready (1200 comments on the 2006 draft). A look > back at any of those published drafts will make it clear” > > > > When we get close to the first public draft we’ll have a good idea, and we > will definitely knowonce we start getting comments! > > > > Until then, I’m not sure there is much worth saying, especially as the > question doesn’t need to be answered until the next charter period. > > > > -Alastair > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:48:46 UTC