Re: CFC: Silver TF Work Statement

WCAGers,
There was a ¨friendly amendment¨ that it´s unclear whether people support which doesn´t seem to change scope anyways, just clarifies it. So we propose to accept the Work Statement as is, with a note that if the WG wants to propose revision and re-CfC that, it can do that. Meanwhile, accepting in its current form, which seemed to have support of the WG, the TF can get started.

This CfC is agreed on as a consensus opinion of the working group.

This decision is recorded at https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Decisions


Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility
Adobe

akirkpat@adobe.com
http://twitter.com/awkawk


From: "josh@interaccess.ie<mailto:josh@interaccess.ie>" <josh@interaccess.ie<mailto:josh@interaccess.ie>>
Reply-To: "josh@interaccess.ie<mailto:josh@interaccess.ie>" <josh@interaccess.ie<mailto:josh@interaccess.ie>>
Date: Tuesday, November 1, 2016 at 12:46
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Subject: CFC: Silver TF Work Statement
Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Tuesday, November 1, 2016 at 12:43

CALL FOR CONSENSUS – ends Thursday Nov 3rd at 5:00pm Boston time.

This is a proposed work statement for the Silver TF that was surveyed, discussed on the WG call, and approved (http://www.w3.org/2016/11/01-wai-wcag-minutes.html).

The original TF work statement can be seen:  https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/work-statement


If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this position, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.

Thanks

Joshue O Connor | Director
InterAccess.ie - Accessible UX