W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: Silver process

From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:15:16 +0000
To: "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3A7F5D43-CEDF-4927-B1C6-2FA7757D05CB@adobe.com>
I think that the most encompassing thing that we can do to highlight the intent is to add to the introduction.

I’ve added:
The goal of the Silver project is to provide a major revision to the WCAG standard, and as part of the update to incorporate requirements for user agents and authoring tools as needed. The process of designing Silver defined on this page describes the steps that the WCAG Working Group will take to pursue the research, experimentation, and initial drafts of the updated standard.

Does that address your concern?


Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility


From: "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org<mailto:jjwhite@ets.org>>
Date: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 at 16:24
To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Subject: RE: Silver process

To be clear, I am comfortable with the process as drafted if clarifications are made to address the issues raised, making the document less exclusively WCAG-focused in the stated scope of the planned work.


This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.

Thank you for your compliance.

Received on Thursday, 27 October 2016 13:15:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:07 UTC