Re[2]: Silver process

Hi Jason,

At this stage, the Silver work is really about researching the 
requirements for the next set of guidelines that
will potentially also support the user agent/authoring tool spaces. To 
what degree this will be the case we just don't know yet. So the current 
document is designed to support this research . As AWK was getting at, 
it's not so much unified field theory for content/User Agent/Authoring 
tools - but a concentrated effort to see what will be practical within 
our new spec to support  content/User Agent/Authoring.

I do think we can enhance the scope of the process doc to indicate that 
we are interested in and actively looking at these domains - but this is 
very early days and the process document is defining just that - the way 
the TF will work.

Could you live with that?

Josh


------ Original Message ------
From: "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org>
To: "Andrew Kirkpatrick" <akirkpat@adobe.com>; "WCAG" 
<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Sent: 26/10/2016 21:24:42
Subject: RE: Silver process

>To be clear, I am comfortable with the process as drafted if 
>clarifications are made to address the issues raised, making the 
>document less exclusively WCAG-focused in the stated scope of the 
>planned work.
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or 
>confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for 
>whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received 
>this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, 
>distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this 
>information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this 
>e-mail is prohibited.
>
>
>Thank you for your compliance.
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------