- From: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 15:14:42 +0300
- To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Cc: "WCAG" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <15800e81ec7.1282ac65c88850.9160059766536292490@zoho.com>
Hi Andrew Are there any controls in place to make sure the stake holders, use cases and personas are sufficiently diverse? If it only focuses on though who turn up they it runs the risk of not addressing the needs of undeclared disabilities. All the best Lisa Seeman LinkedIn, Twitter ---- On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 23:43:30 +0300 Andrew Kirkpatrick<akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote ---- CALL FOR CONSENSUS – ends Thursday October 27 at 5:00pm Boston time. This is a proposed response to an decision of the Working Group. The item was surveyed, discussed on the WG call, and approved (http://www.w3.org/2016/10/25-wai-wcag-minutes.html#item07). The decision is that the process defined at https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Process_of_Designing_Silver is agreed to by the working group as the way forward with a longer effort to research, develop requirements, and begin to produce a major update to WCAG. Please review the minutes of the call and the survey responses as you consider this CfC. If you have concerns about this proposed consensus decision that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this position, please let the group know before the CfC deadline. Thanks, AWK Andrew Kirkpatrick Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility Adobe akirkpat@adobe.com http://twitter.com/awkawk
Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2016 12:15:16 UTC