W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review

From: Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 13:11:11 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJeQ8SBzdwPzFt-padqRZLHrL2m0qDGKFrXTsTUSi_jBSYxYvw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I am abstaining.

I do not know enough since I've been buried in LV work.

I do think that any 2.1 that does not make significant progress for
Low Vision and Cognitive disabilities will be a failure. The  point of
2.1 is to cover identified disabilities that were under covered by
2.0.

Wayne


On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com> wrote:
> But it *did* say two and biennial before people objected, didnt it? Let's be
> considerate please.
>
> Katie Haritos-Shea
> 703-371-5545
>
>
> On Oct 14, 2016 9:58 PM, "Andrew Kirkpatrick" <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>> Wayne,
>> The charter has no commitment to a two year plan, in fact the word “two”
>> doesn’t appear in the charter at all.
>>
>> There is a stated intent for a three year schedule: "The Working Group
>> intends to produce updated guidance for accessibility on a regular interval
>> of approximately three years, starting with WCAG 2.1.”
>>
>> Does three years work better for you?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> AWK
>>
>> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>> Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility
>> Adobe
>>
>> akirkpat@adobe.com
>> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/14/16, 14:23, "Wayne Dick" <wayneedick@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >I do not agree with the two year re lease plan. A two year review plan
>> >is good, but two year seems arbitrary. SC's are interrelated it
>> >doesn't make sense. it seems excessively burdensome.
>> >
>> >I know what you are trying to do, but it is not there. There need to
>> >be a way to balance shorter time to release and completing tasks.
>> >
>> >Wayne
>> >
>> >On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >> This CFC received 18 affirmative votes and one outstanding objection.
>> >> The
>> >> chairs feel that the objection has been considered and was partly
>> >> addressed
>> >> by a compromise in draft charter language. Therefore, it is agreed as a
>> >> decision (https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/decision-policy) of the WCAG
>> >> Working
>> >> Group to advance the draft charter for further review by W3M and the
>> >> W3C AC,
>> >> but we will record the objection along with the decision.
>> >>
>> >> The decision is recorded at https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Decisions.
>> >> The
>> >> one outstanding objection
>> >> (https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2016OctDec/0167.html)
>> >> is
>> >> recorded via reference to this email.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> AWK
>> >>
>> >> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>> >> Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility
>> >> Adobe
>> >>
>> >> akirkpat@adobe.com
>> >> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>> >>
>> >> From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
>> >> Date: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 at 13:10
>> >> To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>> >> Subject: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
>> >> Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>> >> Resent-Date: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 at 13:10
>> >>
>> >> CALL FOR CONSENSUS – ends Thursday October 13 at 1:00pm Boston time.
>> >>
>> >> This is a CfC seeking WG approval to release the current draft charter
>> >> for
>> >> AC review.  The item was surveyed, discussed on the WG call, and
>> >> approved
>> >> (http://www.w3.org/2016/10/11-wai-wcag-minutes.html). There was much
>> >> discussion leading up to the call, and on the call, and the group felt
>> >> that
>> >> a consensus opinion was reached on key items.
>> >>
>> >> Draft charter: http://www.w3.org/2016/09/draft-wcag-charter
>> >>
>> >> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have
>> >> not
>> >> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
>> >> being
>> >> able to live with” this position, please let the group know before the
>> >> CfC
>> >> deadline.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> AWK
>> >>
>> >> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>> >> Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility
>> >> Adobe
>> >>
>> >> akirkpat@adobe.com
>> >> http://twitter.com/awkawk
Received on Tuesday, 18 October 2016 20:12:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:06 UTC