Well, a charter doesn't have "normative" and "non-normative" sections like a spec does. It just has what it says. In this particular case, the content in the deliverables section about regular updates repeated what was said in the background section, so removing one instance doesn't seem to change the meaning of the charter, particularly since it address activities that are outside of the three-year scope of this charter. Michael On 13/10/2016 5:51 AM, Andrew Kirkpatrick wrote: > Léonie, > My understanding is that section 3.1 speaks to the normative documents > to be created by the group, but is not different from the background > section. Michael, can you clarify? > Thanks, > AWK > > Sent from my iPad > > On Oct 13, 2016, at 5:11 AM, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk > <mailto:tink@tink.uk>> wrote: > >> On 12/10/2016 22:43, Andrew Kirkpatrick wrote: >>> David, >>> The chairs and Michael think that this change is editorial because it >>> was already in the background and can be made without affecting the CfC. >>> >> >> Sorry if this puts a spanner (monkey wrench) in the works, but the >> statement David would like removed is normative - so is this really >> an editorial change? >> >> Removing normative content would seem to negate those responses >> already received on this CFC (mine for one). >> >> >> Léonie. >> >> >> >> -- >> @LeonieWatson tink.uk <http://tink.uk> Carpe diem >>
Received on Friday, 14 October 2016 23:08:25 UTC