W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review

From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 09:51:25 +0000
To: "tink@tink.uk" <tink@tink.uk>
CC: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>, "josh@interaccess.ie" <josh@interaccess.ie>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <57C6EB35-4AAB-489B-A4FE-78F8D092700C@adobe.com>
My understanding is that section 3.1 speaks to the normative documents to be created  by the group, but is not different from the background section. Michael, can you clarify?

Sent from my iPad

On Oct 13, 2016, at 5:11 AM, L?onie Watson <tink@tink.uk<mailto:tink@tink.uk>> wrote:

On 12/10/2016 22:43, Andrew Kirkpatrick wrote:
The chairs and Michael think that this change is editorial because it
was already in the background and can be made without affecting the CfC.

Sorry if this puts a spanner (monkey wrench) in the works, but the statement David would like removed is normative - so is this really an editorial change?

Removing normative content would seem to negate those responses already received on this CFC (mine for one).


@LeonieWatson tink.uk<http://tink.uk> Carpe diem
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2016 09:51:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:06 UTC