Re: Re[4]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review

+1, I think I missed the deadline by a bit, sorry about that.

-Shawn

On Oct 13, 2016 1:01 PM, "Marc Johlic" <marc.johlic@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 to this CfC
> (sorry for the last minute response)
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 10:47 AM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
>
>> Yes,  I agree it is editorial, given our consensus on the call.
>>
>> Removing the sentence will address my concerns, and will allow us to make
>> these decisions in due process rather than rushed without full
>> consideration of implications...
>>
>> Cheers,
>> David MacDonald
>>
>>
>>
>> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
>> Tel:  613.235.4902
>>
>> LinkedIn
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>>
>> twitter.com/davidmacd
>>
>> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>>
>> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>>
>>
>>
>> *  Adapting the web to all users*
>> *            Including those with disabilities*
>>
>> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
>> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> David,
>>> The chairs and Michael think that this change is editorial because it
>>> was already in the background and can be made without affecting the CfC.
>>>
>>> So, once that is done, you’re ok with this?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> AWK
>>>
>>> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>>> Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility
>>> Adobe
>>>
>>> akirkpat@adobe.com
>>> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>>>
>>> From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
>>> Date: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 15:35
>>> To: "josh@interaccess.ie" <josh@interaccess.ie>
>>> Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>>> Subject: Re: Re[4]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
>>> Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>>> Resent-Date: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 15:35
>>>
>>> For me the amended charter language doesn't accomplish what I presented
>>> at the phone meeting, because the sentence that I objected to remains in
>>> the Normative Section (3.1) . Can we simply delete the sentence:
>>>
>>> "The Working Group intends to produce regular updates for WCAG
>>> guidelines, starting with WCAG 2.1. The public schedule for the updates is
>>> documented in the AG WG Project Management Plan."
>>>
>>> We've signaled to the ACs in the background section that we intent to
>>> update accessibility guidance on an approximate 3 year cadence. I hope
>>> that's enough ... Removing this sentence from the normative section will
>>> address all my concerns at this time and will allow us to see how 2.1 goes
>>> before we say more about how we will make shorter cycles between releases.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> David MacDonald
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
>>> Tel:  613.235.4902
>>>
>>> LinkedIn
>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>>>
>>> twitter.com/davidmacd
>>>
>>> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>>>
>>> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *  Adapting the web to all users*
>>> *            Including those with disabilities*
>>>
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
>>> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 3:19 PM, josh@interaccess.ie <
>>> josh@interaccess.ie> wrote:
>>>
>>>> >I had the feeling thongs had changed
>>>>
>>>> They sure have :-)
>>>>
>>>> Josh
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>