W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: Re[4]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review

From: Marc Johlic <marc.johlic@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 12:59:40 -0400
Message-ID: <CABpp2mKTJU9a73M-8mCfY8Rvc0AcPkRrEefzgL62bzdWASO6hA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, "josh@interaccess.ie" <josh@interaccess.ie>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
+1 to this CfC
(sorry for the last minute response)

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 10:47 AM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
wrote:

> Yes,  I agree it is editorial, given our consensus on the call.
>
> Removing the sentence will address my concerns, and will allow us to make
> these decisions in due process rather than rushed without full
> consideration of implications...
>
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>
>
>
> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
> Tel:  613.235.4902
>
> LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>
> twitter.com/davidmacd
>
> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>
> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>
>
>
> *  Adapting the web to all users*
> *            Including those with disabilities*
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
> wrote:
>
>> David,
>> The chairs and Michael think that this change is editorial because it was
>> already in the background and can be made without affecting the CfC.
>>
>> So, once that is done, you’re ok with this?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> AWK
>>
>> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>> Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility
>> Adobe
>>
>> akirkpat@adobe.com
>> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>>
>> From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
>> Date: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 15:35
>> To: "josh@interaccess.ie" <josh@interaccess.ie>
>> Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>> Subject: Re: Re[4]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
>> Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>> Resent-Date: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 15:35
>>
>> For me the amended charter language doesn't accomplish what I presented
>> at the phone meeting, because the sentence that I objected to remains in
>> the Normative Section (3.1) . Can we simply delete the sentence:
>>
>> "The Working Group intends to produce regular updates for WCAG
>> guidelines, starting with WCAG 2.1. The public schedule for the updates is
>> documented in the AG WG Project Management Plan."
>>
>> We've signaled to the ACs in the background section that we intent to
>> update accessibility guidance on an approximate 3 year cadence. I hope
>> that's enough ... Removing this sentence from the normative section will
>> address all my concerns at this time and will allow us to see how 2.1 goes
>> before we say more about how we will make shorter cycles between releases.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> David MacDonald
>>
>>
>>
>> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
>> Tel:  613.235.4902
>>
>> LinkedIn
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>>
>> twitter.com/davidmacd
>>
>> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>>
>> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>>
>>
>>
>> *  Adapting the web to all users*
>> *            Including those with disabilities*
>>
>> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
>> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 3:19 PM, josh@interaccess.ie <josh@interaccess.ie
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> >I had the feeling thongs had changed
>>>
>>> They sure have :-)
>>>
>>> Josh
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2016 17:00:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:06 UTC