W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review

From: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 07:36:30 +0100
To: Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>
CC: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>,WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <14f18a4e-dbf8-406e-bb63-771cf5e67512@typeapp.com>
Thanks Detlev. Yes,  the idea is that Silver/AG is applicable to a broader range of platformsn etc. 

Thanks 

Josh 

Sent from TypeApp



On 12 Oct 2016, 04:49, at 04:49, Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de> wrote:
>The one thing where I stumbled is the name change from WCAG WG to AG WG
>(so presumably 'Silver' ending up being called AG 3.0). This sounds
>very different from WCAG and makes it hard to recognise that AG is
>actually an upgrade of WCAG. 
>If the implication of dropping 'WC' is that the scope of the guidelines
>extends to software / native apps in general, this should be made more
>explicit in the charter and elsewhere.
>
>Apart from that issue I think the charter is fine.
>
>Sent from phone
>
>> Am 11.10.2016 um 22:12 schrieb Andrew Kirkpatrick
><akirkpat@adobe.com>:
>> 
>> The url for the minutes is correct, but the link did go to old
>minutes.  Ugh. Here is the link again:
>https://www.w3.org/2016/10/11-wai-wcag-minutes.html
>> 
>> The link to the charter includes the changes. Perhaps your version is
>cached, David?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> AWK
>> 
>> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>> Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility
>> Adobe 
>> 
>> akirkpat@adobe.com
>> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>> 
>> From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
>> Date: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 at 13:10
>> To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>> Subject: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
>> Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>> Resent-Date: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 at 13:10
>> 
>> CALL FOR CONSENSUS – ends Thursday October 13 at 1:00pm Boston time.
>> 
>> This is a CfC seeking WG approval to release the current draft
>charter for AC review.  The item was surveyed, discussed on the WG
>call, and approved
>(https://www.w3.org/2016/10/11-wai-wcag-minutes.html).  There was much
>discussion leading up to the call, and on the call, and the group felt
>that a consensus opinion was reached on key items.
>> 
>> Draft charter: http://www.w3.org/2016/09/draft-wcag-charter 
>> 
>> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have
>not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you
>“not being able to live with” this position, please let the group know
>before the CfC deadline.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> AWK
>> 
>> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>> Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility
>> Adobe 
>> 
>> akirkpat@adobe.com
>> http://twitter.com/awkawk
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2016 06:37:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:06 UTC