- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 11:54:34 -0400
- To: "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org>
- Cc: Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com>, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAdDpDbQRp07FYb0KLqXVBK9fwuGNyC971GsFZB72-kmn1cZzA@mail.gmail.com>
That would work for me. Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 10:58 AM, White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote: > > > > > *From:* Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL [mailto:ryladog@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 5, 2016 10:00 AM > > There are options between 10 years and 2 years. I believe we need to take > a well thought-out, more conservative stance, than two year view. > > > > Somewhere in between for new SC and a new standard – let’s say – 3 > (extremely optimistic), 4 (optimistic), or 5 years (but no more than 5). > > *[Jason] Hi Katie,* > > Would you be comfortable with the following, which I put forward in order > to understand your position rather than as a proposal at this stage? > > · Commit to completing WCAG 2.1 within the next Charter period, in > parallel with work on Silver. > > · Allow the Working Group to refine requirements (e.g., draft > success criteria) that are unable to be included in WCAG 2.1. It would be > decided near the end of the Charter period whether to seek approval to > develop a subsequent WCAG 2.x release or whether to incorporate these > requirements into Silver, depending on the state of progress in development > of the latter. > > · Make no commitment now to developing any WCAG 2.x releases other > than 2.1, and remove any and all reference in the Charter to biennial > releases. > > > > ------------------------------ > > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or > confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom > it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail > in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or > take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete > it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited. > > Thank you for your compliance. > ------------------------------ >
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2016 15:55:05 UTC