Small amendment to minutes.... it says I said "I agree that a 2 year cycle
is reasonable."
What I said is that I agree with Katie and Bruce's view that a 2 year cycle
is problematic, at lease under our current model (Principles, Guidelines,
SCs, and Techniques)...
I'd rather see a 4-5 year cycle for Success Criteria (Normative Work) and a
tight 6 month cycle of techniques updates that hang off of our stable SCs
which are updated every 4-5 years. Some of that rapid cycle technique work
could be supported by EO.
Cheers,
David MacDonald
*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
Tel: 613.235.4902
LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
twitter.com/davidmacd
GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
* Adapting the web to all users*
* Including those with disabilities*
If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com> wrote:
> Howdy everyone,
>
> The minutes for today's meeting can be found at:
> https://www.w3.org/2016/10/04-wai-wcag-minutes.html
>
> --
> *Wilco Fiers* - Senior Accessibility Engineer
>
>
