W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2016

RE: Combining the sizing SCs

From: Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 12:25:09 -0400
Message-ID: <CAEy-OxEBh7RcfhEMW2r4qYdNrLOmaGSOtnpTMZVJqzoob-TonQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org>
Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, AlastairCampbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Exactly. Thanks Jason!

Katie Haritos-Shea
703-371-5545

On Oct 3, 2016 11:33 AM, "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote:

>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL [mailto:ryladog@gmail.com]
> > Laura,
> >
> > Thanks. I do think WCAG might need to provide clarification on the
> combining
> > issue. Do we want the least number of SC or do we want good testable
> specific
> > SC?
> [Jason] To the extent that there's a conflict between those two
> objectives, it should be recalled that criteria which aren't "specific" and
> "testable" are unlikely to be accepted into a W3C WCAG Recommendation. That
> is, I don't think there's a general willingness to accept a reduction in
> quality by comparison to what went into WCAG 2.0, especially in any
> document that has policy mplications, as WCAG 2.1 is expected to do.
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or
> confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom
> it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail
> in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or
> take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete
> it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
>
>
> Thank you for your compliance.
>
> ________________________________
>
Received on Monday, 3 October 2016 16:25:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:06 UTC