RE: Combining the sizing SCs

Exactly. Thanks Jason!

Katie Haritos-Shea
703-371-5545

On Oct 3, 2016 11:33 AM, "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote:

>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL [mailto:ryladog@gmail.com]
> > Laura,
> >
> > Thanks. I do think WCAG might need to provide clarification on the
> combining
> > issue. Do we want the least number of SC or do we want good testable
> specific
> > SC?
> [Jason] To the extent that there's a conflict between those two
> objectives, it should be recalled that criteria which aren't "specific" and
> "testable" are unlikely to be accepted into a W3C WCAG Recommendation. That
> is, I don't think there's a general willingness to accept a reduction in
> quality by comparison to what went into WCAG 2.0, especially in any
> document that has policy mplications, as WCAG 2.1 is expected to do.
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or
> confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom
> it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail
> in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or
> take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete
> it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
>
>
> Thank you for your compliance.
>
> ________________________________
>