Re[2]: Checklist for Proposals

>A substantive suggestion: in item 4, where a new Guideline is needed, 
>perhaps it should be proposed separately and then referred to by each 
>Success Criterion proposal that is related to it.
>
Sorry Jason, I don't understand how this idea is different from the 
current process? I feel like I'm missing something here! It maybe 
obvious, but please clarify your reasoning for me.

Thanks

Josh


>This suggestion is not an objection to the CFC, but I think it would be 
>best to treat proposals for new Guidelines separately, indicating 
>clearly what success criteria (proposed by the working group or by one 
>or more of the task forces) should reside under them.
>
>
>
>Editorial Comments:
>
>1.      Substitute “Success Criteria” (or, where the singular is 
>intended, “Success Criterion”) for “SC” throughout, for consistency.
>
>2.      Under item 1, “an existing success criteria” should read “an 
>existing success criterion”. Similarly for “Ensure that the criteria 
>is” should be “ensure that the criteria are” (or “criterion is”, 
>depending on how you decide to correct the grammar) in item 1 of the 
>Best Practice Guidelines.
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or 
>confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for 
>whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received 
>this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, 
>distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this 
>information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this 
>e-mail is prohibited.
>
>
>Thank you for your compliance.
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------