- From: Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2016 14:19:52 -0700
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: WCAG WG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 30 July 2016 21:21:01 UTC
I got a little too specific on that sup-pixel example. What I meant is that the seizures SC just may be too narrow, and there might be a way to pull back and say that configurations that cause seizures or extreme discomfort (well defined of course) should not appear in web pages. The cases could change as the technology changes. Wayne On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > Wayne wrote: > > “There is a different case involving text customization where > sub-pixelation causes severe nausea. > > https://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/2012/text-customization/p7.html > > It's almost like there should be a forbidden patterns criteria.” > > > > That’s quite a different trigger, even if the effect on the person is > similar. > > > > Without wanting to go down a different rabbit hole, I’m curious if > sub-pixel rendering is still an issue. > > Browsers and devices have changed quite a bit since IE9 was new. > > > > Anyway, best to stick to animation with user-interaction for this thread J > > > > Cheers, > > > > -Alastair > > >
Received on Saturday, 30 July 2016 21:21:01 UTC