RE: Do we want a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1?

Gregg,

 

I think it depends on how sophisticated sensor web applications become, because they are advancing very rapidly and how they interact with the secure hardware elements in devices….

 

​​​​​

 

 

 

* katie *

 

Katie Haritos-Shea 
Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)

 

Cell: 703-371-5545 |  <mailto:ryladog@gmail.com> ryladog@gmail.com | Oakton, VA |  <http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/> LinkedIn Profile | Office: 703-371-5545 |  <https://twitter.com/Ryladog> @ryladog

 

From: Gregg Vanderheiden RTF [mailto:gregg@raisingthefloor.org] 
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 11:18 PM
To: Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com>
Cc: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>; Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>; GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Do we want a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1?

 

that is a hardware requirement — 

 

there is no way for an author to add a physical device to their website. 

 

am I missing something? 

 


gregg 

 

On Jul 21, 2016, at 11:12 PM, Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com <mailto:ryladog@gmail.com> > wrote:

 

What I would like to suggest is an additional and different SC that requires at least two types of biometric options.

 

​​​​​

 

 

 

* katie *

 

Katie Haritos-Shea 
Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)

 

Cell: 703-371-5545 |  <mailto:ryladog@gmail.com> ryladog@gmail.com | Oakton, VA |  <http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/> LinkedIn Profile | Office: 703-371-5545 |  <https://twitter.com/Ryladog> @ryladog

 

From: Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:gregg@raisingthefloor.org] 
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 11:07 PM
To: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca <mailto:david100@sympatico.ca> >
Cc: Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com <mailto:ryladog@gmail.com> >; Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk <mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk> >; GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org <mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> >
Subject: Re: Do we want a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1?

 

Yes - that is what it says the AUTHOR must do.  

 

To make content “Keyboard operable”  you must make sure that it is operable via the content or user agent's keyboard interface.  

 

Then anything that feeds keystrokes to the user agent (browser) will be able to control the content.    (keyboard, voice to text, sip and puff program, etc)

 

The author doesn't actually make it usable from the physical keyboard.  they make it accessible from the keyboard interface of their software or the user agent. 

 

gregg

 

On Jul 21, 2016, at 8:53 PM, David MacDonald < <mailto:david100@sympatico.ca> david100@sympatico.ca> wrote:

 

2.1.1 says all functionality of the page has to be achievable with keyboard.




Cheers,
David MacDonald

 

CanAdapt Solutions Inc.

Tel:  613.235.4902

 <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> LinkedIn 


 <http://twitter.com/davidmacd> twitter.com/davidmacd

 <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> GitHub

 <http://www.can-adapt.com/> www.Can-Adapt.com

  

  Adapting the web to all users

            Including those with disabilities

 

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our  <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> privacy policy

 

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL < <mailto:ryladog@gmail.com> ryladog@gmail.com> wrote:

Thanks David,

 

Well,  also allowing for an alternate biometric as well as via text input…..

 

Can you point me to the Biometric that you are talking about?

 

​​​​​

 

 

 

* katie *

 

Katie Haritos-Shea 
Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)

 

Cell:  <tel:703-371-5545> 703-371-5545 |  <mailto:ryladog@gmail.com> ryladog@gmail.com | Oakton, VA |  <http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/> LinkedIn Profile | Office:  <tel:703-371-5545> 703-371-5545 |  <https://twitter.com/Ryladog> @ryladog

 

From: David MacDonald [mailto: <mailto:david100@sympatico.ca> david100@sympatico.ca] 
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 7:21 PM
To: Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL < <mailto:ryladog@gmail.com> ryladog@gmail.com>; Patrick Lauke < <mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk> redux@splintered.co.uk>
Cc: WCAG < <mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Do we want a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1?

 

yup... we currently require any input including Bio-metric,to be keyboard accessible, but perhaps there is room for more.

 

It might fit into Patrick's wider "input" conversation, categorizing input devices (camera, shaking manipulating, etc.) into three broad categories, with perhaps a special category. It's a conversation in the mobile task force that has just begun but I guess will spill out because of it's general nature.




Cheers,
David MacDonald

 

CanAdapt Solutions Inc.

Tel:   <tel:613.235.4902> 613.235.4902

 <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> LinkedIn 


 <http://twitter.com/davidmacd> twitter.com/davidmacd

 <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> GitHub

 <http://www.can-adapt.com/> www.Can-Adapt.com

  

  Adapting the web to all users

            Including those with disabilities

 

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our  <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> privacy policy

 

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL < <mailto:ryladog@gmail.com> ryladog@gmail.com> wrote:

Folks,

 

Along the same lines as the ‘Functional Performance-like’ SC, do we want discuss including a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1?

 

​​​​​Thanks!

 

 

 

* katie *

 

Katie Haritos-Shea 
Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)

 

Cell:  <tel:703-371-5545> 703-371-5545 |  <mailto:ryladog@gmail.com> ryladog@gmail.com | Oakton, VA |  <http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/> LinkedIn Profile | Office:  <tel:703-371-5545> 703-371-5545 |  <https://twitter.com/Ryladog> @ryladog