- From: <josh@interaccess.ie>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 04:56:19 +0000
- To: "David MacDonald" <david100@sympatico.ca>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "Jeanne Spellman" <jeanne@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 15 July 2016 04:54:16 UTC
------ Original Message ------ From: "David MacDonald" <david100@sympatico.ca> [...] > >Are there any SCs that have been overcome sufficiently by the >environment, OS, User Agents etc. that we can remove them without >breaking the acceptance requirement of WCAG 2.1 that meeting it also >meets 2.0? I think this question has merit, and is related to the question of what SCs are showing their age, and/or are things that are just not substantial fails (or may not represent significant a11y issues any more). Thanks Josh > >Cheers, >David MacDonald > > >CanAdapt Solutions Inc. > >Tel: 613.235.4902 >LinkedIn > >twitter.com/davidmacd > >GitHub > >http://www.can-adapt.com/ > > > > Adapting the web to all users > > Including those with disabilities > >If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
Received on Friday, 15 July 2016 04:54:16 UTC