- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 13:00:18 -0400
- To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, Jeanne Spellman <jeanne@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 14 July 2016 17:00:52 UTC
On today's mobile call Jeanne brought up an important consideration as we make the WCAG 2.1. If 2.1 seems much longer than 2.0 we may be facing resistance to the new version. It came up in the context of the question about whether we should try to roll new SCs into the existing SCs where possible, or introduce new SCs. But I think the issue raises another question. Are there any SCs that have been overcome sufficiently by the environment, OS, User Agents etc. that we can remove them without breaking the acceptance requirement of WCAG 2.1 that meeting it also meets 2.0? Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
Received on Thursday, 14 July 2016 17:00:52 UTC