Re: University of Illinois automated tool WCAG failures

> On Jul 6, 2016, at 2:20 PM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> From that analysis I identified 24 failure techniques that I think we could consider for WCAG 2.1 which address current WCAG 2 failures. I set up a WIKI here.

 they are failures of 2.0  - they would are documented as failures there - not for 2.1.

If 2.1 is a guideline— it would contain no failures.  Failures are just “common things that people do that would fail an SC”.   

if it is a failure of 2.0 it would be documented there. 

if it is not a failure of 2.0 but a failure of 2.1 - it would be documented in the techniques and failures of 2.1 

—— or did you mean something else? 

gregg

> On Jul 6, 2016, at 2:20 PM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> 
> I did an analysis of all of the checks in the University of Illinois Functional Accessibility Evaluator (FAE) by Jon Gunderson, through the lens of WCAG 2.
> 
> http://davidmacd.com/WCAG/review-of-ruleset-OAA.html <http://davidmacd.com/WCAG/review-of-ruleset-OAA.html>
> 
> From that analysis I identified 24 failure techniques that I think we could consider for WCAG 2.1 which address current WCAG 2 failures. I set up a WIKI here.
> 
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Failures_based_on_the_Functional_Accessibility_Evaluation_(FAE)_tool_from_the_University_of_Illinois <https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Failures_based_on_the_Functional_Accessibility_Evaluation_(FAE)_tool_from_the_University_of_Illinois>
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>  
> CanAdapt Solutions Inc.
> Tel:  613.235.4902
> LinkedIn 
>  <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
> twitter.com/davidmacd <http://twitter.com/davidmacd>
> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>   
>   Adapting the web to all users
>             Including those with disabilities
> 
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>