- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 21:14:50 +0100
- To: "public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org" <public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
On 04/07/2016 20:05, David MacDonald wrote: > Maybe we can borrow language from SC 2.4.5 the essential exception: > > * > SC X.X.X If text is resized up to 200% (or 300, 400, 800%?) without > assistive technology, the layout of the Web page ensures that it can be > viewed in its entirety without requiring the user to scroll the viewport > horizontally, and without loss of content or functionality, unless a > particular presentation of text is essential to the information being > conveyed. You'd also need to leave it open to the possibility that a small-screen version does things such as show additional links to separate pages which contain the content that was optimized away/hidden compared to the large screen version. i.e. the "desktop" version may have 2 columns with lots of ancilliary features/widgets, while the "mobile" version drops most of the ancilliary features, but unhides links to separate pages where these features/widgets can still be accessed (or completely different widgets, that serve the same purpose). Basically, the same thinking behind the conforming alternate version wording (even though we're not saying that a different layout triggered by RWD is an alternate version, I do think the wording here can be borrowed): "[...] does not need to be matched page for page with the original (e.g., [...] may consist of multiple pages)." P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Monday, 4 July 2016 20:15:19 UTC