- From: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 14:27:23 +0000
- To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <FAD48DDE-D36F-4949-AB66-536A9F086ED3@ssbbartgroup.com>
Yes. But at what resolution? I use 800x600 on the desktop. We'd need to define some minimum resolution or someone could could be testing at 1600x800. Jon Sent from my iPhone On Jul 4, 2016, at 10:06 AM, Adam Solomon <adam.solomon2@gmail.com<mailto:adam.solomon2@gmail.com>> wrote: if the user can zoom up to 200% without loss of content, then it is fine. If not, then you are absolutely right. On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk<mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk>> wrote: On 04/07/2016 14:30, Adam Solomon wrote: It is common in responsive design to provide different even limited functionality for mobile users as David described. We should not disallow such a design pattern under any circumstances. Each view must be accessible. However, if a mobile user cannot access the higher res view and instead is fed a limited mobile-oriented view and that view is accessible then there is no discrimination against that user, for all users in the mobile environment are given the same accessible functionality. What happens if the reduced functionality mobile view is triggered because the user (e.g. on a desktop/laptop) has simply set their zoom to be high enough to comfortably read the site? I think there's some overlap here where it does fall within the realm of accessibility. Consider a situation where a webmaster has two sites, one of which provides more functionality, while the other less. No violation here. Extending this logic to a situation where the server feeds content and functionality based on user preferences, so too no violation. When access to functionality is determined by client scripts (but not because of lack of accessibility) so too there should be no violation of wcag. Webmasters have the right to determine what content is available to users, unless the criterion for that decision inherently discriminates against users who require accessible content. In the zoom scenario, that would be the case, arguably. P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk<http://www.splintered.co.uk> | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Monday, 4 July 2016 14:27:57 UTC